Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

2 Subjects

Assignment 2 Conflict Resolution Project

Assignment 2 Conflict Resolution Project

Q Please note that this assignment is due the end of Week 4. However, begin your work on this during Week 3 as it will take some time to plan and schedule this assignment out. You will approach a current conflict situation that you face in your work. You may also choose a current conflict outside of work if you like. Most importantly, choose a situation that is relevant and important to you. Using the tools and techniques discussed in the text (Chapters 3-5) and covered in other resources, you will communicate with someone you have a current conflict with. You will identify your goal (for example, to get a certain action/outcome; to sway a decision; to influence a change in behavior; to be heard; etc), and you will decide what approach you want to take. You will then communicate with that person (you can choose the most appropriate and available channel). Following your interaction, you will diagnose how it went and what you might have done differently to improve the chances of meeting your goal. Submit a 4-page write-up (double-spaced) in the appropriate folder. Include any reference to the reading that you feel is appropriate and use specific techniques and terminology from Chapters 3, 4 and 5. These and additional conflict management tips and strategies have been discussed in class. Go into depth in your write-up, provide support for key points and include specifics and examples where possible. Copy/paste the questions and place your answers beneath. Your write-up should include the following: A. Description of how you prepared for the interaction, including: • What is the nature of the conflict? Provide a brief description of what is going on and a brief history. • What is your goal (desired outcome) in communicating with this person regarding the conflict? • Your approach: What techniques, from Chapters 3-5 and class, do you plan to use, and why? There are about forty techniques to choose from in Chapters 3-5! You should describe (and apply) at least two specific techniques from each of the chapters 3, 4 and 5, which equals a total of at least six specific techniques (Note: Ch 5 has some of the most powerful techniques for conflict). Note: the techniques in the textbook tend to be highlighted in Green and there are many of them to choose from. For example: "Withhold Judgment" (page 66), "Talk and Interrupt Less" (page 68), "Choose the Optimal Degree of Powerful Language" (page 85), "Demonstrate Interest in Others" (page 101), "Focus on Solving Problems, Not Controlling Others" (page 114), and "Agree with the Criticism" (page 119). The most important of all may be "Use Descriptive 'I' Language" (page 114). As you choose your six techniques, the approaches like Compromise and Collaboration, Accommodation do not count since they are overall approaches, not techniques, per se. It is important that you provide a concrete example or enough description (what you plan to say and why it might be helpful) for each technique so I can see that you understand the techniques. Note that general approaches like "Collaborate" or "Accommodate" don't count towards the minimum six techniques as these are just general approaches, not specific techniques. B. Description of the interaction: • What happened? How did your interaction go? You do not need to provide every detail, but do provide highlights, including some specific examples of what you said, how the other side reacted (what did they say?), and how you reacted to something they said. • What techniques did you end up using? Provide examples or enough description so I can see that you applied the techniques you listed above. • What went well or most effectively? Why? • What did not go as well as you would have liked? Why? C. Description of the outcome of the interview: • Discuss how you felt the interaction went. Did you achieve your goals? Why or why not? • What strengths did you bring to the situation? • Where were you most challenged? • What might you do differently if you were to do it again? Your write-up should be in clear, readable English. If you struggle with English writing, consider consulting GGU’s OWL service, which helps students strengthen their written English. Also, be sure to run Spelling and Grammar check in Microsoft Word or other document tool to correct any glaring mistakes. • What is the nature of the conflict? Provide a brief description of what is going on and a brief history. • What is your goal (desired outcome) in communicating with this person regarding the conflict? • Your approach: what techniques, from Chapters 3-5 and class, do you plan to use, and why? There are about forty techniques to choose from in Chapters 3-5! You should describe (and apply) at least two specific techniques from each of the chapters 3, 4 and 5 (Ch 5 has some of the most powerful techniques for conflict). You should mention and describe at least six techniques in total. Note: the techniques in the textbook tend to be highlighted in Green. There are over 25 techniques to choose from that can help you manage your encounter. For example: "Withhold Judgment" (page 66), "Talk and Interrupt Less" (page 68), "Choose the Optimal Degree of Powerful Language" (page 85), "Demonstrate Interest in Others" (page 101), "Focus on Solving Problems, Not Controlling Others" (page 114), and "Agree with the Criticism" (page 119). The most important of all may be "Use Descriptive 'I' Language" (page 114). It is important that you provide a concrete example or enough description (what you might say and why it might be helpful) for each technique so I can see that you understand the techniques. Note that general approaches like "Collaborate" or "Accommodate" don't count towards the minimum six techniques as these are just general approaches, not specific techniques. B. Description of the interaction: • What happened? How did your interaction go? You do not need to provide every detail, but do provide the high points so I can see what happened. • What techniques did you end up using? (Again, you should apply at least two techniques from each chapter). • What went well or most effectively? Why? • What did not go as well as you would have liked? Why? C. Description of the outcome of the interview: • Discuss how you felt the interaction went. Did you achieve your goals? Why or why not? • What strengths did you bring to the situation? • Where were you most challenged? • What might you do differently if you were to do it again? This assignment is due one week from this Saturday (i.e., due Next Saturday). It is good to begin this week if you can. Your write-up should be in clear, readable English. You should go into depth and provide specifics. One- or two-sentence responses are insufficient. If you struggle with English writing, consider consulting GGU’s OWL service, which helps students strengthen their written English. Also, be sure to run Spelling and Grammar check in Microsoft Word or other document tool to correct any glaring mistakes. Be sure to address all questions in sections A, B and C, above.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

What is the nature of the conflict? Provide a brief description of what is going on and a brief history. The nature of the conflict between me and my subordinate team member has been related to work or tasks assigned to the subordinate team member by me. This is because the work done by this subordinate team member has been mostly of inferior quality in most projects and occasions. There has been work done at the last moment just before the completion of the deadlines of different tasks. This subordinate team member has been working late at night while working from his home. The quality of the work is becoming deteriorated mostly when this subordinate team member is working very late at night. However, this subordinate team member is not willing to change his working habits arguing that the low quality of some tasks has been because of the misjudgment made by the subordinate team member. The subordinate team member has completely disagreed about the aspect that working late at nights has made him become unable to focus like in the daytime. The subordinate team member has not accepted the aspect that working in the daytime can keep the team member more energized and not lose focus like in late nights. When confronted with the aspect of meeting deadlines just before some time of completion of deadlines, this subordinate team member has argued about not missing deadlines. This is because this subordinate team member has not missed any deadline in the past 6 months. However, as a manager it is mu duty to warn this subordinate team member to not keep working in this way. This is because there could be sudden issues with internet or technology for which deadlines of tasks or projects can be missed. There can also be this subordinate team member falling sick suddenly after which the deadlines can never be met in such situations. Moreover, the health of this subordinate team member can deteriorate drastically because of regularly working late at night. There can be no other team member available to assist this subordinate team member if the subordinate team member faces any technical or other issues and challenges to completion of work during late at night. Therefore, the